223 subsonic with clays powder full#

IIRC, according to 'The Load', magnum primers and filler aren't needed. it basically forces all the RD to be somewhat compressed position (where its supposed to be, up close to the primer (not spread out around the case) They shoot like a 22LR with a heavy bullet. They were about 1050 out of a 22 inch barrel. I load some with 3gr of Hodgdon Clays powder. Some guys have had luck putting creme of wheat on top of the charge load and then seat the projectile on top of that. I see that one can use Hodgdon Titegroup 3.1gn, behind a 55gn projectile, in a 223 case for velocities like 1,064 f/s and 4,000 CUP. As indicated, there is a The 180 grain subsonic. Not the most ideal situation when you want to get consistent results. I tried the drilled flash hole/Clays or other standard pistol powder loads. It is now spread (lightly) I might add in the horizontal plane. 223 would be a subsonic 40 grain 22lr they would also function with the conversion and cost less to shoot. The inconstant power burn you are getting is coming from the powder not filling enough of case capacity, Think about where the powder lays when you go to load a round. Just slightly less energy than a 55 grain subsonic. I'm starting to wonder if magnum primers might fix it. It fills more than half the case with powder. It's around a 1 moa load but it gets crazy flyers that miss the paper.Ī friend said it may be due to inconsistent powder ignition due to excess empty case capacity. Other sources include trailboss, tight group and clays. 308 under a 150 gr plated flat nose rmr bullet Powder being hard to come by, I was wondering what people were using for. They are super-quiet through a can, and they hit just as hard as a copper bullet that you might call a '.223.' though it is exactly the same bullet, FAPP.I've been loading 13 grains of red dot in. Subsonic jet problem : II, Mec Appl v 32 n 1 ( Jan - Feb 1987 ) p 3-19. 22, using Aguila 60 grain Sniper Subsonics. , 2A504 IWATA, N : Two - dimensional numerical analysis of the shock. You will get much more mileage and fun, out of a suppressed. 308 and 6.8 subsonics and it works fantastically well. It is probably the safest powder you'll find for subs because of its shape and the volume of the case it can fill, without concerns about a detonation. 223 subs are pretty worthless, and if you take any risk loading them I think the risk outweighs the benefits. 223 Remington as the caliber, 55 grains as the bullet weight, Hodgdon as the powder manufacturer, and H322 as the powder. 223 can - and cheaper, and they don't stick in the bore. 223 loads for his silenced AR - after dismal results in the accuracy department and after 4-5 stuck bullets we scrapped the idea. I helped a friend of mine try to develop some subsonic. I already made some in 308, I did not have any problems with mine but then I did not want to so I have not loaded many more. I was just asking because that's what I was told.

223 subsonic with clays powder full#

V-Max went through 3 milk jugs full of water and stopped in the 4th jug. However, that does not appear to be the case. Good luck I found their data and plan to work with it. I had hoped that maybe some of the fragile varmint bullets would break up at subsonic velocities. Hodgdon OAL would be mag length or shorter, should be in loading data. Still, it's kind of neat having a jacketed bullet that you can fire through an unmodified AR15.

22LR is going to be just as effective as a subsonic. That being said, there is still the argument that a. I mostly use IMR Trailboss, simply because it fills the case much better than any of the other fast pistol powders. I've played around a little with subsonic. 223 rifle would make the bullet less prone to being unstable. 22 LR? If anything, the faster twist on the. 223 case, but the same bullet is just fine at that velocity when fired from a. Isn't there also a risk of the bullet being unstable and hitting baffles for you suppressor guys?